Copyright and Licensing
Articles accepted for publication will be licensed under the Creative Commons BY-NC-SA. Authors must sign a non-exclusive distribution agreement after article acceptance.
Digital transformation belongs to industry 4.0, and has positively impacted the economic sectors through the digitization of processes and adoption of digital technologies, generating a digital culture, changing environments, new development models, new processes, creation of products and services in an organization. Analyzing the positive effects of digital transformation, a systematic review of the literature has been carried out to know the current status of digital transformation processes in the education sector, where there is evidence of few frameworks validated in higher education scenarios to implement digital transformation processes. This article presents previous results related to the current state of digital transformation processes in higher education institutions, which has allowed to advance in the development of a proposal for a framework that supports the implementation of transformation processes in educational institutions in their mission functions. The proposal will be focused on a projective analytical research methodology, the method of action research of quantitative type proposed, makes it possible to analyze the data of a population in 7 higher education institutions in the city of Popayan, department of Cauca (Colombia).
L. Alunni and N. Llambías, “Exploring digital transformation from within,” Palermo Bus. Rev. , vol. 17, pp. 11–30, 2018.
M. Lucía et al. , “NATIONAL COUNCIL OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL POLICY CONPES Iván Duque Márquez President of the Republic.”
T. Delgado Fernández, “Taxonomy of digital transformation,” Rev. Cuba. Transform. Digit. , vol.
, pp. 4–23, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4323-9674
K. Schwertner, “Digital transformation of business,” Trakia J. Sci. , vol. 15, no. Suppl.1, pp. 388–393, 2017, doi: 10.15547/tjs.2017.s.01.065.
A. Bockshecker, S. Hackstein, and U. Baumöl, “Systematization of the term digital transformation and its phenomena from a socio-technical perspective – A literature review,” 2018.
MH Ismail, M. Khater, and M. Zaki, “Digital Business Transformation and Strategy: What Do We Know So Far? University of Cambridge,” J. Univ. Cambridge , no. November 2017, 2018, [Online]. Available: www.camb[7] A. Fernández Martínez, F. Llorens Largo, and R. Molina-Carmona, “Digital maturity model for universities (MD4U),” Cátedra Santander-UA Transform. Digit. - Job Doc. , pp. 1–16, 2019, [Online]. Available: http://rua.ua.es/dspace/handle/10045/99031
Journal of Computer Science & Technology, Volume 24, Number 2, October 2024
A. Fernández Martínez, F. Llorens Largo, and R. Molina-Carmona, “Digital maturity model for universities (MD4U),” Cátedra Santander-UA Transform. Digit. - Job Doc. , pp. 1–16, 2019, [Online]. Available: http://rua.ua.es/dspace/handle/10045/99031
MA Mohamed Hashim, I. Tlemsani, and R. Duncan Matthews, “A sustainable University: Digital Transformation and Beyond,” Educ. Inf. Technol. , 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-10968-y.
T. Delgado Fernández, “Digital transformation taxonomy,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4323-9674
Z. Van Veldhoven and J. Vanthienen, “Digital transformation as an interaction-driven perspective between business, society, and technology,” Electron. Mark. , 2021, doi: 10.1007/s12525-021- 00464-5.
CP Lopez, J. Aguilar, and M. Santorum, “Autonomous VOs management based on industry 4.0: a systematic literature review,” J. Intell. Manuf. , 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10845-021-01850-8.
NH Thanh, “Digital Transformation: Smart Strategy in Administrative Reform in Vietnam,” HighTech Innov. J. , vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 328–345, 2021, doi: 10.28991/hij-2021-02-04-06.
S. Etlinger, “The Conversational Businesss,” pp. 1–
, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://andyblackassociates.co.uk/wp- content/uploads/2015/06/ConversationalBusiness_ FINAL-1.pdf
R. Morakanyane, A. Grace, and P. O'Reilly, “Conceptualizing digital transformation in business organizations: A systematic review of literature,” 30th Bled eConference Digit. Transform. -From Connect. Things to Transform. our Lives, BLED 2017 , pp. 427–444, 2017, doi: 10.18690/978-961- 286-043-1.30.
Conpes 3855 - 2016, “C Onpes,” p. 38, 2016.
FJ García-Peñalvo, “Avoiding the dark side of digital transformation in teaching. an institutional reference framework for eLearning in higher education,” Sustain. , vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1–17, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13042023.
M. Deja, D. Rak, and B. Bell, “Digital transformation readiness: perspectives on academia and library outcomes in information literacy,” J. Acad. Librariansh. , vol. 47, no. 5 p. 102403, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102403.
D. Abraham and C. Gaibor, “DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION IN TODAY'S UNIVERSITY,” 2020.
CE Miller, “Leading Digital Transformation in Higher Education,” no. June, pp. 1–25, 2019, doi: 10.4018/978-1-5225-7769-0.ch001.
A. de Bem Machado, S. Secinaro, D. Calandra, and F. Lanzalonga, “Knowledge management and digital transformation for Industry 4.0: a structured literature review,” Knowl. Manag. Practical Res. , vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 320–338, 2022, doi: 10.1080/14778238.2021.2015261.
TN Hai, QN Van, and MNT Tuyet, “Digital transformation: Opportunities and challenges for leaders in the emerging countries in response to covid-19 pandemic,” Emerg. Sci. J. , vol. 5, no. Special Issue, pp. 21–36, 2021, doi: 10.28991/esj- 2021-SPER-03.
H. Antonopoulou, C. Halkiopoulos, O. Barlou, and GN Beligiannis, “Associations between traditional and digital leadership in academic environments: During the COVID-19 pandemic,” Emerg. Sci. J. , vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 405–428, 2021, doi: 10.28991/esj- 2021-01286.
Upadrista, V. (2021). Formula 4. 0 for Digital Transformation: A Business-Driven Digital Transformation Framework for Industry 4. 0. Productivity Press.
K. Kerroum, A. Khiat, A. Bahnasse, ES Aoula, and Y. Khiat, “The proposal of an agile model for the digital transformation of the University Hassan II of Casablanca 4.0,” Procedia Comput. Sci. , vol. 175, pp. 403–410, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.07.057.
P. Kilimis, W. Zou, M. Lehmann, and U. Berger, “A survey on digitalization for SMEs in Brandenburg, Germany,” IFAC-PapersOnLine , vol. 52, no. 13, pp. 2140–2145, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.522.
C. Gebayew, IR Hardini, GHA Panjaitan, NB Kurniawan, and Suhardi, “A Systematic Literature Review on Digital Transformation,” 2018 Int. Conf. Inf. Technol. Syst. Innovation ICITSI 2018 - Proc. , pp. 260–265, 2018, doi: 10.1109/ICITSI.2018.8695912.
K. Chowdhury and D. Lamacchia, “Collaborative workspace for employee engagement leveraging social media architecture,” Soc. Pet. Eng. - Abu Dhabi Int. Pet. Exhib. Conf. 2019, ADIP 2019 , 2019, doi: 10.2118/197325-ms.
J. Hemerling, J. Kilmann, M. Danoesastro, L. Stutts, and C. Ahern, “It's not a digital transformation without a digital Culture,” Bost. Consult. Gr. , pp. 1–11, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://www.bcg.com/publications/2018/not- digital-transformation-without-digital-culture.aspx
R. Gacitua, H. Astudillo, B. Hitpass, M. Osorio- Sanabria, and C. Taramasco, “Recent Models for Collaborative E-Government Processes: A Survey,” IEEE Access , vol. 9, pp. 19602–19618, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3050151.
J. (2017) Clerck, “Digitization, digitalization and digital transformation,” 2017, [Online]. Available: https://www.i-scoop.eu/digital- transformation/digitization-digitalization-digital- transformation-disruption/
P. Parviainen, M. Tihinen, J. Kääriäinen, and S. Teppola, “Tackling the digitalization challenge: How to benefit from digitalization in practice,” Int. J. Inf. Syst. Proj. Manag. , vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 63–77, 2017, doi: 10.12821/ijispm050104.
N. Verina and J. Titko, “Digital transformation: conceptual framework,” 2019, doi: 10.3846/cibmee.2019.073.
C. Gebayew, IR Hardini, GHA Panjaitan, NB Kurniawan, and Suhardi, “A Systematic Literature Review on Digital Transformation,” 2018 Int. Conf. Inf. Technol. Syst. Innovation ICITSI 2018 - Proc. , No. August 2019, pp. 260–265, 2018, doi: 10.1109/ICITSI.2018.8695912.
K. Petersen, R. Feldt, S. Mujtaba, and M. Mattsson, “Systematic mapping studies in software engineering,” 12th Int. Conf. Eval. Assess. Softw. Eng. EASE 2008 , pp. 1–10, 2008, doi: 10.14236/ewic/ease2008.8.
K. Petersen, S. Vakkalanka, and L. Kuzniarz, “Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update,” Inf. Softw. Technol. , vol. 64, pp. 1–18, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2015.03.007.
CH Botero, A model for documentary research: theoretical-practical guide on the construction of states of the art with important reflections on the research . Editorial Signal, 2000. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.com.co/books?id=Wa3PAQA ACAAJ
MN Córdoba and C. Monsalve, “Types of research, predictive, interactive, confirmatory and evaluative,” Fund. Sypal , pp. 139–140, 2008.
R. Hernández Sampieri, C. Fernández Collado, and M. del P. Baptista Lucio, Research Methodology . Mexico: McGRAW-HILL / INTERAMERICANA EDITORES, SA DE CV, 2005.
Copyright (c) 2024 Alex Armando Torres Bermúdez, César A. Collazos, Alicia Mon
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Articles accepted for publication will be licensed under the Creative Commons BY-NC-SA. Authors must sign a non-exclusive distribution agreement after article acceptance.
Review Stats:
Mean Time to First Response: 89 days
Mean Time to Acceptance Response: 114 days
Member of:
ISSN
1666-6038 (Online)
1666-6046 (Print)